And btw, in the 19th century it worked just fine for this man:
nostr:nevent1qqs0p8g566gh47ylyu4lumycv4wqeu2z8qkfjv0a87lxkv5cf7vmcnqwk7fav
Discussion
22 is a little young for a man to marry but 9 is perfect for a woman.
a man should marry at 30. woman at 9-13.
22 is fine in this case because he has a tobacco farm and is well established.
you are correct men used to mature faster because they didn't have to waste a decade on education back then ...
today women mature faster ( sexually ) due to estrogenic environment ...
so men today should marry later but women earlier ...
9 yo is too much young. No one in that age can make a decision about marry or not. If you support this you have a complete sick mind
The decision rests on the father, and less so on the girl. The father will have the right mind.
You are the sick one for disagreeing.
You're just outsourcing the decision to force a kid into marriage to her parents. This is still rape. Consent must come from the own person, not from the other people
It's not rape. The girl will have to say yes to it, but rather, the intellectual aspect rests on the father.
If it's rape because she can't figure out all intellectual aspects by herself, then so be it.
In your theory, if the 9 yo daughter manifest the will of NOT marry, should be her forced to do if the father wants to?
NΓ£o perca seu tempo discutindo com gringos pedos.
Eu só quero testar até os pseudos-argumentos deles vão. Um cara que glorifica casamento forçado de uma criança de 9 anos é doente mental
Depends on the version of patriarchy. Personally, I would agree to her decision, but later punish her severely and mold her towards wanting a marriage.
That said, most little girls of that age would say yes if given the right upbringing, so I'm not worried.