Still wrapping my head around, “what is a woman? Somebody who identifies as a woman. What is bitcoin? Some blockchain that identifies as bitcoin……. And has the most economic power.” I think the “economic power “ is like the XX chromosome unless I’m missing something. This op return change does not sit well with me. If miners want to spam crap, it’s easily traceable back to the miner. What is being opened up with this change? Bitcoin is a monetary network. Period. Read the fuck’n white paper! You want shit? Go build it somewhere else or put it in your own fuck’n database and own it!
First and foremost, I want to say nostr:nprofile1qqsvfr3f7p95stxqrjslnmuvsmhcxxxqt8swjdfjx5tz7zq0yms5cygpramhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0v3jhyatwdejhyuewdejhgam0wf4szyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn930dx5s fuck you too, I listened on fountain while I work and not on live stream on nostr. Second, my opposition to the op_return is that it will enable more ETH-like things on bitcoin, I do agree that we are not talking about consensus rules, so the solutions at hand are not viable. Good episode with nostr:nprofile1qqs9r742wut5rt24z58w8z095pht6632g24fg99d8urxc9m09snxzkcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkc7k0u2s. Worth the listen.