Why should they relay to nodes that don't even support BIP47? SAMOURAI users are likely to use paynyms, so a "knot" not forwarding the transaction is of no use and just uses bandwidth the node/Tor-network could spend on connections that actually support 100% of the use cases.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This whole drama still feels petty to me. Maybe it makes a little bit of sense except they could just put in a message to users and be done with it. Definitely seems a lot more like a resentful “well two can play this game” than some genuine technical decision.

It may very well be a “two can play this game” reverse attack, but I love it.

Well i think it's part of openly communicating what they are doing.

Propably they want to report what they are doing so nobody compares them whith Luke QUIETLY blacklisting btc adresses in the default gentoo repo for bitcoind some 10(?) years ago.