Oh I see. Yeah I think the event id should be written if the user is reporting a note. That’s a “ui bug” I think
Discussion
Sorry, not the event id. They are not writing that this is just "bad content". They are just writing full-on "Spam" and "Explicit" reports. They could create another category for "Bad Content". But they are not doing it.
What would a general “bad content” report offer over the more specific report tags?
I frankly don't know. But if they need something lighter than the other strong report tag categories (which is what people seem to be talking about here), they could create a new one.
It's not always bad content; sometimes they even flag dark memes as explicit, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's bad content.
Moreover, they often flag content for promoting shitcoins. nostr:npub1dyr5z60ddra8fsma8ynrt86pqp34cdlw5h87ecrya5pza5r00y4shzq6f3, for instance, has received approximately 58 reports simply for announcing the launch of a shitcoin.
Feel like personal content curation is in the domain of clients, ie not report events. UI could offer users a way to do this but it wouldn’t alone stop report event abuse.
Mute words would be good. Clever ML based client-side filtering would be awesome. The UX really only needs to be easier than submitting a report event. That said, even thought I don’t like shitcoins and I don’t want to see that crap, I guess some people will feel conviction in censoring stuff they think is a scam.
Think about impersonation accounts. There is a classic Damus impersonator that most Damus users reported and thus show with warnings on Amethyst. If you are being impersonated, you will find the report system very useful to let your followers know that is not you. And it's fully decentralized.
I agree. That’s why I’m differentiating between personal client-side filtering and report events
While I opted to just mute wolf, rather than report, others may go out of their way to report even if it takes 5x more UI interaction to do so, if they feel conviction in their assessment.
🫡👏