#Russia ministry of defense officially replied with a rather nonsensical statement which doesn’t actually respond to any of the facts but instead only serves fueling confusing on the #NATO side:

No targets were planned on Polish territory.

This most likely means: “yes we fired them into Poland but with no intention of hitting anything so you shouldn’t consider this attack legally”. Logically, if NATO fires a rocket over Russia and it just hits a random town when it runs out of fuel it should not be considered an attack.

The Ministry of Defence emphasised that the maximum range of the Russian drones used in the strike was up to 700 km.

Logically, if NATO fires a rocket over Russia and says “it’s range is 700 km” then the attack didn’t happen. But logic doesn’t apply here - the sole purpose of this paragraph is to reassure the conspiracy theorists and Putinverstehers in EU.

Moscow is ready to hold consultations with the Polish Ministry of Defence on the situation with UAVs.

This simply reinforces the first message - “yes, we fired the drones at Poland, but it was not a real attack, only a routine provocation, now what”.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.