😂😂😂 I love how you say “SIMPLE logic” while presenting a classic false dilemma. It’s a bit like saying, “Either you eat pineapple on pizza, or you’re an enemy of humanity.” Meanwhile, there are plenty of other alternatives—such as, you know, actually considering other scientific models.

Let me break this down for you:

1. “Something can’t come from nothing” – Sounds intuitive, but modern physics has explored concepts like quantum fluctuations, vacuum energy, and spontaneous emergence. The Big Bang isn’t just “Nothing → POOF → Universe!” It’s based on quantum mechanics and relativity.

2. “Either something is eternal, or it came from nothing” – You present this as if these are the only two options, but modern cosmology offers others:

• Cyclic Universes (the universe expands, contracts, and repeats)

• Multiverse Theories (our universe is part of a larger “foam” of universes)

• Quantum Cosmological Models, which challenge our classical understanding of space and time.

3. “Atheists ignore science when it doesn’t fit their narrative” – Oh, hello there, projection! Science changes its views based on new evidence—the exact opposite of faith, which clings to a fixed dogma.

4. “You must give up your pride to believe in the Bible” – I don’t know who’s prouder: the person who says, “We don’t know everything, but we keep exploring,” or the one who says, “I have the absolute truth because a book told me so.” 😉

At the end of the day, your argument doesn’t seem interested in science—it seems interested in certainty. But science isn’t here to satisfy our need for simple answers; it’s here to understand reality, no matter how complex or counterintuitive it may be.

But hey, if you prefer to live in SIMPLE logic, have fun with that. I’ll try to stick with reality. 😘😘

Cheers