nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub1j3vtkuurx77yzs33ufzzc08syhrqca8aawa5p4afnfqxrnzvugmqrmqxec nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6

1. reinvent redundant CDN service except NOSTR!!!11

2. it's free

3. wait that's not sustainable. relays start charging

4. oh look it's back to being a paid CDN

seems like the only upside here is that migrating between vendors is transparent because it's the equivalent of paying someone to seed a torrent for you. of course the obvious downside is that anyone can jump in and host your stuff and in so doing sample your traffic

I don't see why a solution where you pay for speed couldn't be implemented on top of ipfs. but then http relays for ipfs already exist and could be paid to serve your content quickly. and that protocol seems better suited to the task