That's the beauty of this. It doesn't matter what you think. People can do whatever they want in Nostr.
Discussion
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6 no it's really just stupidity, bittorrent/ipfs exists for this exact reason
Again, it doesn't matter if it's stupidity or not.
But to your claim, I tried IPFS and torrents. They don't work for websites. They are way too slow.
But Nostr does.
nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z nostr:npub1j3vtkuurx77yzs33ufzzc08syhrqca8aawa5p4afnfqxrnzvugmqrmqxec nostr:npub108pv4cg5ag52nq082kd5leu9ffrn2gdg6g4xdwatn73y36uzplmq9uyev6
1. reinvent redundant CDN service except NOSTR!!!11
2. it's free
3. wait that's not sustainable. relays start charging
4. oh look it's back to being a paid CDN
seems like the only upside here is that migrating between vendors is transparent because it's the equivalent of paying someone to seed a torrent for you. of course the obvious downside is that anyone can jump in and host your stuff and in so doing sample your traffic
I don't see why a solution where you pay for speed couldn't be implemented on top of ipfs. but then http relays for ipfs already exist and could be paid to serve your content quickly. and that protocol seems better suited to the task
> I don't see why a solution where you pay for speed couldn't be implemented on top of ipfs
Then do it. Let's see if it actually works.