Replying to Avatar ODELL

well pretty sure i coined the term shotgun kyc and the nuance matters, its strictly better to be upfront about it then lock users in and force it on them

doesnt seem possible to ship a self custody wallet that accepts small zaps but we may move to spark or something like that when the tech matures, its a priority but dont want to rush it and have users lose funds
Avatar
ynniv 5mo ago

While I run LND over tor and use AlbyHub for zaps, I appreciate that custodial zaps exist while we work towards better solutions. I'm still unable to receive zaps because that requires LNURL and doesn't work with onion services, but I think we can eventually work this out and have fully anonymous, self custodial zaps

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
trev 5mo ago

i will also be waiting for that solution, but i'm afraid it will never come. at least not in any 9 eyes countries

Avatar
ynniv 5mo ago

It's just code - NWC could have a safe way to generate a public connection string that can only make invoices, and clients could use this instead of an LNURL address

Avatar
trev 5mo ago

But clients can already implement NWC, no?

Avatar
ynniv 5mo ago

Yes, but there isn't a nice way to generate NWC connections that are safe, so no one is putting them in their nostr profiles, therefore no clients implement it. I admit that I should push harder for this, but I'm fixated on something bigger right now