Replying to Avatar Cyph3rp9nk

by nostr:npub13l3lyslfzyscrqg8saw4r09y70702s6r025hz52sajqrvdvf88zskh8xc2

This new paper is a true declaration of war: the ECB claims that early #bitcoin adopters steal economic value from latecomers. I strongly believe authorities will use this luddite argument to enact harsh taxes or bans. Check đź§µ for why:

Rather than praising bitcoin as a tech paradigm shift Ă  la petroleum and the internet, the authors introduce the blatantly luddite argument that "early adopters" ... "increase their real wealth and consumption" ... "at the expense of [latecomers]".

Then they go on to brazenly advocate for legislation ... "to prevent bitcoin prices from rising or to see bitcoin disappear altogether" in order to prevent "the division of society".

The authors also model some projections, to illustrate the paltry amount of BTC that will remain available for latecomers. (Woe is me! Conspicuously left out is the reason that has driven 15 years of bitcoin adoption & development: it's simply better tech.)

In all the years I've been monitoring the bitcoin space, this is by far the most aggressive paper to come from authorities. The gloves are off. It's clear that these central bank economists now see bitcoin as an existential threat, to be attacked with any means possible.

Many of us have warned that this was coming: bitcoin as a major political fault line both in national and international elections. Well here it is. It means that us HODLers must take action to insure that governments respect our basic right to hold property.

And no, this won't be a war between haves and have-nots. Rather this will be a historic clash between those who stand for the natural rights of the individual, and those who clutch at the failed ideologies of collectivism and central planning.

Here's the download link to the paper: "The distributional consequences of Bitcoin". (We need detailed rebuttals. Who's writing one?)

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4985877

Any pyramid scheme works like that. It's why you yell at people "have fun staying poor". Works as intended.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I suppose from a central banker’s POV, the benefits of inflation are more widely spread as compared to the concentrated gains made by those early to Bitcoin.

e.g. if inflation is at 2% but my pay rise is at 5% then I’m ok. And for those who can’t secure pay rises above inflation then the government’s increased tax haul linked to inflation (fiscal drag, greater receipts from sales taxes) helps fund support from social welfare programmes.

nostr:npub1g7lqk25fl24xd0zh7hr8jgp5smdy2eszjh9nmv7z7w85h6xcs9hq4u8yd9 what’s the best argument you have in favour of the current monetary system?

> what's the best argument you have in favour of the current monetary system?

prices more stable than any other system in existence, past or present

Btw no one has made any gains from Bitcoin. Those who had one 1 BTC years ago still have 1 BTC today.

If Bitcoin had a circular economy like fiat does you could gain from Bitcoin by lending it. But it doesn't so you don't.

All in good time….

note1j3p8fkcjknshulrdhvgcgpkqa5dr2zj3wvdx5984u29ptyjn0dase5fahn

Ok I'll come back and talk to you 'in good time".

Unless you lend it to somebody. This is possible on major crypto-platforms/exchanges.

Oooh. Please provide pointers. I wasn't aware of BTC lending platforms.

Ooooh interesting. It says something about 0.5% APY on BTC.

Is that an offer from the platform? Who am I lending to? How do I assess the risk.

Can I borrow too?