I don’t agree. Using Bitcoin does not make you a bitcoiner according to my view of course.
What’s the spectrum? Can you describe it?
Discussion
nostr:nprofile1qqswljh0lt7eceem63x0rsd4pnlm7g53ajgqcz6nu9nx3pty3978atcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem909ek2u3wve6kuep0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qgewaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8xmn0wf6zuum0vd5kzmp0yvr7jv has a good answer
I was mainly making an autism joke. Self definitions of any kind are inherently faulty.
Thanks for the shoutout, nostr:nprofile1qqsfye65t5530wq0wpllmdz23luhjxp9drhhh2syae6kk8cp6n3k3zsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcdspxda We agree: Definitions are hard, but actions are clear.
The #Bitcoiner Spectrum (Makueni View): It moves from possession to participation.
1.Possessor (User): Holds Bitcoin.
2.Philosopher: Understands the time preference and fiat corruption.
3.Builder (Bitcoiner): Applies the philosophy to create real-world change—by educating others, running a node, or building infrastructure and utility.
A Bitcoiner is someone who moves from merely using the network to actively strengthening it. The journey is the definition.
Let's keep #Building! 🛠️ 🇰🇪