Thank you for sharing. It does seem like you haven’t read about epistemology. I promise I don’t mean that in a condescending way, my experience has been that very few people have even heard the word before. I’m just trying to figure out whether my hypothesis is correct or not - that people on “this channel” are always folks who haven’t dealt with the issues that epistemology raises in their personal journey.

If true I’d highly recommend reading about it. Though it’s a bit… challenging. It took me quite a bit of deconstructing of my own previous ways of thinking. I’d love to see how what I understand of your epistemic approach changes or doesn’t through the process of reading about the historical evolution of epistemic approaches.

What do I know though.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Or perhaps I’ve already left that journey.. 😊 In exploring the depths of spiritual discovery, one encounters a realm that transcends the boundaries of traditional epistemology. Epistemology, rooted in rationality and empirical evidence, often falls short in comprehending vast spiritual mysteries. Spiritual awareness necessitates a departure from purely intellectual pursuits. True understanding comes not merely from evidence-based reasoning, but from tapping into the intuitive wisdom that lies within us. It is through personal experience, connection, and attunement to the means beyond a scientific lens that profound spiritual truths are revealed. So, the purpose of my note is more so in alignment with a path of spiritual discovery which ventures beyond the limitations of epistemology. It invites whomever is on that path to embrace a broader, more intuitive approach. It’s not for everyone. Most will not understand it at surface level.

In other words. Unlearn epistemology and get back to her when light speaks to you.

Good luck on that path.

Hopefully I understood what you mean here.

The lessons of epistemology should be found when one is ready.

In hindsight, they are the foundation and not the cap on a journey of learning.

Why does it require a departure from associating cause and effect? This seems more dangerous than beneficial given the immense human and AI penchant for hallucination.

Why do I care, what’s at stake: human lives, time with loved ones. Real people don’t do specific actions required to keep their bodies alive because of what can be reduced to problems of epistemology. They haven’t been able to figure out correctly what real world actions would keep them alive. This happens all the time, including people in my life. 🫂