It's a very abstract problem. Because we have only one empirical datapoint. Which is our own existence. You can't prove a negative about the existence of other intelligent civilizations, their time horizons for emergence, yet unknown constraints on interstellar travel, etc.

At the end of the day, Drake's equation sort of bootstraps from

The Law of Big Numbers and then goes from there. So it's a fundamentally statistical argument for which we have no empirical ground for nominator and denominator in the function. Well, we know the nominator is a minimum value of 1, because we exist.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

In other words, where are all the aliens 👀

That was Enrico Fermi's question!

Yes 👽

#[3]​ there is a great YouTube video that explains the paradox. This is an old one I remembered watching.

https://youtu.be/sNhhvQGsMEc

One of my favorite explorations of Fermi Paradox by Tim Urban: https://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/fermi-paradox.html

He’s great. He just published a book.

https://amzn.asia/d/dfz5D2L

Neil Degrasse Tyson says (paraphrasing): “asking where are all the aliens are is like going to the ocean, scooping up a glass of water and saying: ‘I don’t see any whales in here…’”

It’s possible that life after a certain point just progresses inwardly (simulating it’s own environment) rather than exploring distances it could not possibly cover. This is one theory I’ve been thinking about and wrote a fun little essay exploring

This is one of the major theories, yes. I'm weirdly skeptical of it. But that might only be because I'm too romantic about how the human behavioral utility function in our genetics works.

I love the theory of panpsychism. It would be beautiful if true- it’s basically that all things have a “mind-like” quality. I romanticize it as “consciousness came first and birthed all reality.”

I like it. Thank you. Will read up on this too.

This is an essay I wrote a while back. It explores some of these concepts, timelines and my thoughts about what may actually happen. https://undefined.scribbble.co/posts/phase-4

Kudos on writing a whole essay on this. Thanks for sharing. Will take a look.

100% on your first point. I also believe our definition of “life” is limited in that it’s entirely self referential. Something can exist but we are unable to perceive it.

First time hearing of Drake’s equation too and you seem to have summed it up nicely. It’s conjecture.

“The nominator is a minimum value of 1, because we exist.” Very poetic.