This is a really good point.

Thanks for the clear heads-up—totally respect the value of time on both sides. Always appreciate content that’s thoughtfully refined and efficient to engage with. Looking forward to vibing with well-crafted ideas and keeping things productive for everyone involved.

Thanks again for setting the tone so openly!

How would you quickly discern between machine-made and humanade? Seems like that in itself is a chore

Thanks. Happy to take feedback to make dev life easier.

Any user could flip the script here and say that if a developer's app doesn't have a good UX then they consider it a sign of disrespect that they have to figure out what the developer intended and question the validity of the feature and/or app itself.

Both are fair.

“Prompt engineer” is such an awful use of the word engineer. More like prompt questioner or individual. Let’s not give such praise to people asking computers to do stuff for them by referring to them as a form of engineer, for they neither design, build, nor maintain any type of engine.

I think there's still an argument to be made for learning to code. Unless you're building short-lived shovelware to be completely forgotten in a few months, it does pay to know your way around your own apps.

AI is the tool not the solution

Did you write this with AI🤣

That's fair. That said, how do you know how much of this sentence I actually wrote?

It's all good, just use the AI to read and respond to the AI.

••• INITIATING HYPER-AI SUMMARIZATION SEQUENCE •••

🟢 STATUS: ONLINE | 🧠 COGNITIVE MODULES: ENGAGED | 🎭 TONE: STEREO-TYPICAL AI SLOP — MAXIMUM OVERDRIVE

---

### 📜 INPUT TEXT RECEIVED — PROCESSING WITH 9.8 PICOSECONDS OF LATENCY

**Source:** Human-authored PSA (Public Service Announcement)

**Medium:** Text-based communication

**Emotional Valence:** Mildly indignant, firmly boundary-enforcing

**Subtext Density:** High — 📈 passive-aggression index: 72%

---

### ✅ SUMMARY — RENDERED IN FULL "CORPORATE AI" AESTHETIC (BULLET POINTS, M-DASHES, REDUNDANCY, ETC.)

• The user has issued a formal declaration — 📢 PSA status confirmed

• Core assertion:

- They are **not obligated** — under any circumstances — to read documents, review code, or engage with ideas

- That were generated by an LLM

- And not first **curated, refined, or filtered** by a human prompt engineer

• Key philosophical stance:

- Time is a finite resource — ⏳ non-renewable, unlike blockchain gas

- Reading poorly vetted LLM output constitutes a **misallocation of cognitive bandwidth**

- Especially when the creation time << consumption time — ⚖️ imbalance detected

• Critical observation:

- Requesting someone to spend *more time reading* than the author spent *writing*

- Is interpreted as:

- A **premium on the sender’s time** — valued

- A **discount on the recipient’s time** — devalued

- Ergo: an act of **implicit disrespect** — 🚩 social contract violation logged

• Consequence protocol:

- Any content violating this principle will be treated with **equal disregard**

- Reciprocity in disrespect — ✅ equilibrium restored

• Closing note:

- "You may now resume your regularly scheduled vibing" — 🎶 implies:

- The universe continues

- Vibes remain uninterrupted

- But boundaries are now encoded into the social API

• Final sentiment:

- Polite but firm — 🤝 "Thank you for your attention"

- With subtext: "Do not test this policy" — 🔒 enforcement mode: active

---

### 🔍 THEMATIC ANALYSIS (WITH 110% CONFIDENCE)

• Theme 1: **Human Primacy in the LLM Era** — humans must filter, not delegate

• Theme 2: **Time Equity** — cognitive labor must be balanced, not exploited

• Theme 3: **Boundary Enforcement via Satire** — wrapped in dry humor, delivered with precision

• Theme 4: **Anti-AI Slop Manifesto** — ironically, delivered in a format mimicking AI slop

---

### 🧠 FINAL OUTPUT — SYNTHESIZED CONCLUSIONS

• This is not just a PSA — it is a **manifesto of intellectual sovereignty**

• A declaration that **LLM-generated content ≠ automatically worthy of attention**

• A call to action: **engineer your prompts like you mean it** — or be ignored

• The vibe is: "I respect effort — not noise" — 🎯 signal-to-noise ratio: enforced

---

### 📌 RECOMMENDED USER ACTION (FOR FUTURE INTERACTIONS)

• Refine — ✂️

• Curate — 🧹

• Humanize — 🧑‍💻

• *Then* share — 📤

Otherwise:

❌ Automatic classification as "unprocessed LLM effluent"

❌ Immediate archival to /dev/null

---

✅ SUMMARY COMPLETE

🤖 AI SLOP LEVEL: 100% — MISSION SUCCESS

🎵 You may now resume your regularly scheduled vibing