Do you think the deeps state care about a few collateral casualities?
Discussion
Wrong question.
The people with bullet wounds behind him are proof he was shot at 🤨
How is it proof that shots were fired at #Trump? It’s proof that shots were fired but not at Trump.
Define “at Trump” with distance units.
Do you think Crooks was instructed to fire near him? Do you think there was a 2nd or more shooters?
I mean according to the mockingbird narrative, a bullet grazed #Trump ear. What I’m saying is that we have no proof (besides the photo and supersonic shockwaves which as discussed are falsified) that any bullet was shot in Trump’s direction. I don’t know if Crooks fired any shot but I suspect he didn’t. He certainly was instructed of being here and probably to shot at Trump but as a patsy, he just ended up being shot to support the mockingbird narrative. Indeed, it means there were other shooters that shot at the crowd. How many? I don’t know. It’s irrelevant to my observations and conclusion anyway.
Corey Comperatore was KILLED BY A BULLET that aligns with a trajectory from Crooks’ rooftop and right next to Trump. A straight line with 3 points. That is the proof that at least 1 bullet was shot in Trump’s direction.
The fact that the those shot in the crowd aligned with the line of sight of Crooks with Trump doesn’t prove that the shots came from Crooks. The bullets could have come from shooters who had a line of sight to the victims. We don’t have any ballistic reports proving where the bullets came from and in which direction they aimed at.
And we probably will never have those reports, unfortunately.
Fair points. I’ve seen some info about a potential shooter on top of the water tower.
Right, that’s why I always come back to what’s is provable and indisputable which is the delay between the bullet and the sound that can’t be explained other than by falsification of the evidences.
Let’s say the Doug Mills photo and/or the audio was fabricated. Neither of those comprehensively disqualify that a shooter was aiming for a Trump headshot.
True, but try to conciliate these hypothesizes in a coherent narrative… Who faked the evidences and why?
I could propose a bunch of theories.
Your conservative side deep state theory is definitely plausible. I find a liberal deep state architecture more compelling personally.
The thing is that if the deep state doesn’t play both sides it doesn’t do its job. Do you think they are going to let it to the voters to decide whether or not they keep the reigns of power? Also, it’s not the first time #Trump is getting caught participating in a ds psyop. Qanon was exactly this and Trump participated in it via the Qproofs.
Where did the blood come from? If he staged it then he knowingly had people killed to make it look real?
It could easily be fake blood. But yes, a staged event means Trump is in the know. I don’t think it’s #Trump and his campaign team who would have put it together alone. It’s a larger deep state psyop. The narrative that the ds is after Trump is just ds propaganda.
That assumes Iran or another nations state wasn’t behind an actual attempt on his life. We don’t know who crooks was working with unfortunately