I am glad yoy understand my points.

I think I have a fairly good understanding of what is happening under the hood.

It will be interesting to see how this dynamic plays out in the future.

I am not concerned about a miner changing a transaction however I do see the very real threat of miners censoring transactions in the future. From a protocol level it may be in the miners incentive to always include the transactions with the highest fee however I see significant external pressure from governments ect on miners that could outweigh this incentive.

As you said we might just go around in circles.

It seems to me that while you understand what I am saying you do not see the P2P description as being potentially misleading in the same way I do.