Subnostr

I agree with you that woke has nothing to do with gender equality, except in as much as woke transgenderists are undermining and subverting gender equality by pushing for men to be allowed to categorize themselves as women, thus bypassing the legal protections that women need to protect ourselves against male oppression and violence, given that males are physically stronger than us.

jimbocoin 🃏 2y ago

What women need are guns and #Bitcoin.

Guns neutralize any physical strength disparity. Bitcoin makes wealth unconfiscatable.

These two technologies, used together, make anyone a sovereign individual.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Celata 2y ago

A woman owning a gun would not stop a biological male from stealing a sporting award from her by competing in the women's category claiming to be a woman, or a mob from physically attacking her for saying it was unfair.

https://www.rebelnews.com/transgender_swimmer_lia_thomas_exposed_report

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/riley-gaines-tells-lawmakers-she-was-held-against-my-will-for-hours-by-trans-activists/

jimbocoin 🃏 2y ago

It sounds like there may be a market opportunity for someone to start a biological-female-exclusive sports organization. The XX-Games?

Celata 2y ago

Alternatively just don't allow men to compete in women's sports by claiming to be women, it's not hard. It's easy to test objectively whether people are male or female, it's written in their DNA.

jimbocoin 🃏 2y ago

The question to me is “who’s league is it?” Someone must be the owner/operator of the league, and it’s up to them to decide what their criteria are for competition.

A successful league operator will choose those criteria which attract competitors and viewership. If the league operator chooses their criteria poorly, they should go out of business, leaving an opportunity for a competing league operator to fill the market niche.