A woman owning a gun would not stop a biological male from stealing a sporting award from her by competing in the women's category claiming to be a woman, or a mob from physically attacking her for saying it was unfair.
https://www.rebelnews.com/transgender_swimmer_lia_thomas_exposed_report
nostr:npub1rkc386aldh9p28pfw87guc0r0rft9j2mtvpf0zdfjm4y0fm469hs6cy8dq nostr:npub19llaw9thx3qf5n3zge0sadkehftrmxr9rkjcrgf5jywjzh29g72slknvrx nostr:npub1v9qy0ry6uyh36z65pe790qrxfye84ydsgzc877armmwr2l9tpkjsdx9q3h trans women *are* women.
Sure, just like trans presidents are presidents if they "identify" as presidents. They don't get to give the orders or have the bodyguard though, no matter how much they stamp their feet.
It sounds like there may be a market opportunity for someone to start a biological-female-exclusive sports organization. The XX-Games?
Alternatively just don't allow men to compete in women's sports by claiming to be women, it's not hard. It's easy to test objectively whether people are male or female, it's written in their DNA.
The question to me is “who’s league is it?” Someone must be the owner/operator of the league, and it’s up to them to decide what their criteria are for competition.
A successful league operator will choose those criteria which attract competitors and viewership. If the league operator chooses their criteria poorly, they should go out of business, leaving an opportunity for a competing league operator to fill the market niche.
