If sending money is speech, then wouldn’t limitations on money transmission be limitations on speech?
Discussion
That's the argument that we need to make
In the context of campaign finance, the courts have upheld that donations are speech, and blocking donations would be a violation of the first amendment.
It follows that if sending money is speech, then regulating money transmission is regulating speech—and violates the first amendment.
Yes
Yes and they are
Code is free speech. Any limitations on the usage and distribution of code is an attack on free speech.