After 1 year of Monero Tail Emission practice, this monetary policy seems to be well designed and giving good non-inflationary results.

A year ago, and two months after starting Tail Emission in Monero, I published a critical article, about the proposed modification of Bitcoin monetary policy towards Tail Emission.

Clearly, for $XMR to be non-inflationary is the right design.

The objective of Tail Emission is to secure the network, as the miners must charge for their work with commissions, which are made up of the issuance of money and for the use of the network for transactions.

If transactions by adoption do not increase, and there is less and less emission, the network will lose miners, and security.

Do you think #Monero will have a growing and massive adoption in the coming years, being a #privacy network that will be fought by governments?

I don't think it will have a massive adoption like other networks.

That's why Tail Emission makes sense.

#Monero is for those who understand that privacy is key to individual sovereignty and for those who understand the coming nightmare: CBDC

My intellectual honesty does not allow me to delete my article.

You can read it: