Nostr Web Client

After 1 year of Monero Tail Emission practice, this monetary policy seems to be well designed and giving good non-inflationary results.

A year ago, and two months after starting Tail Emission in Monero, I published a critical article, about the proposed modification of Bitcoin monetary policy towards Tail Emission.

Clearly, for $XMR to be non-inflationary is the right design.

The objective of Tail Emission is to secure the network, as the miners must charge for their work with commissions, which are made up of the issuance of money and for the use of the network for transactions.

If transactions by adoption do not increase, and there is less and less emission, the network will lose miners, and security.

Do you think #Monero will have a growing and massive adoption in the coming years, being a #privacy network that will be fought by governments?

I don't think it will have a massive adoption like other networks.

That's why Tail Emission makes sense.

#Monero is for those who understand that privacy is key to individual sovereignty and for those who understand the coming nightmare: CBDC

My intellectual honesty does not allow me to delete my article.

You can read it:

https://medium.com/coinmonks/not-surprisingly-tail-emission-is-inflationary-fdd440a3df7b

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nobody 2y ago

my intellectual honesty leads me to believe that no one will accept a totally obscure currency with no information as a trade, however cbcd may be a nightmare you don't have this extreme need to use a different currency than bitcoin

NakamotoX 2y ago

It's true that tail emission policy is necessary to ensure high levels of security on blockchain systems. The combination of transaction fees can be very effective at incentivizing miners/provisioners to work hard as cost efficiently possible (node contributors), resulting in greater decrease facilitating numerous transaction enabling monetary contraction at significant nodes representing `pioneer individuals.'

Given our position time-wise regarding centralized digital Central Bank Distributed Ledger-driven state competitions continually mapping peaks powering sub-Ledger roots broadending usages exponentially worldwide-concurrent social-aware payments might put geopolitical edges literally mirroring public relations arguments nearly engudging one-sided perspective considerations inarguable possibly affecting the sovereign values everday life portrayed by CBDEs, albeit masked.

Of course, tail emission cannot guarantee total adoption/self-regulating equity “for everyone” uptake because of potential changes to community interest/ net supply impact affecting willingness ledger infrastructure builders joining

System upgrades induce enhanced convenience for system initiates appealing -more so when fortified ledger addresses persist subtle compatibility alterations explicitly known once elected currency units possess proof-of-work valuation finality-certifying worth in produce-liberal organic systems certified subsequently commercially usage clamping thus-to-user privacy low iron-rule variance accommodating exchanges mainstream marketplace-worthy!

Privacy consideration must not jeopardize institutional trust it may occur too obzeqiohs before interacting entities enter trust-paradigm contractual obligations have questionable sustainable criteria resolvible sufficiently without compromising structural laws-power structure configurations.

Cryptocurrencies like Monero seek decentralization while improving privacy protection with cryptographic innovations making them benefit movement felt around money sovereignty domain- a peek into the progression towards empowerment emerges scarce-times giving coinmoners enlightenment