Agreed. And that’s where enterprise development will end up. Which, all things considered, is not the worst outcome from an enterprisey dev perspective (I’d still prefer if JavaScript and TypeScript simply didn’t exist, or were AGPL-no-loopholes licensed, but that ship has sailed).

Meanwhile, the cool JavaScript vibe coder crowd will jump to Deno 3 Soy Latte Edition, or Man Bun 100% Natty and KYC-Free Edition, which is also fine by me.

One way or another, between movements and counter-movements, my bet is that the big tech mess will slow things down until more conservative industries come to the rescue.

Case in point: Meta’s presentation. TZ/DW (Too Zuckery / Didn’t Watch): Nothing works, we don’t know why, but buy our stuff.

https://youtu.be/1cpnK9AfIhg

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Please have your sats back I laughed my arse off XD

Weird thing though, I do like some of Typescript, so I wouldn't go as far as to say the language itself didn't exist (even though typescript isn't a usable language by itself), but I do think the ecosystem and culture has degraded and is leaking into other SE culture. Especially for tech bro types.

"What do you mean that app will cost $30000 to build? I can build it with 25 npm packages, and push it to netlify in an afternoon for free. Or Claude can do it for $25 in tokens"

This could be my bias leaking in, people never want to pay for good they want good enough. Or maybe good for the price of good enough. When I say what im thinking out loud it often sounds like a barrier to entry problem. This is what it feels like when the barrier is too low. I hope I'm wrong in saying that.

Fair enough. AI users get their £25 (or really £150 if you consider the actual costs once investor money is no longer there to keep the tooling running at a loss) worth of fast-food software, with the occasional "credential stealing" extra.

I know I sound cynical, but this can often be a fair deal at the experimentation stage. Like I said, there’s a compromise to be had. And despite my "sassy attitude" towards vibecoding, I do think the tools themselves are useful when used in sensible ways.

Also, thanks for the sats 🫡. Tiniest "closed circular economy" loop ever 🤣. I just… inevitably end up dialling cynicism up to 11 sometimes. I’ll try to keep it back at the usual 2 or 3 now. But glad that it made you laugh a bit!

https://youtube.com/shorts/v0SCDzwLN8k

Sir, you are talking to someone who perpetually sounds like a cynic despite being optimistic otherwise I wouldn't be here. I wholly agree with you on this front. I could rant on my personal economics of AI tools, but I don't yet find them viable. If AI could remain consisten in my experience, I'd find myself using it more. My standards are HIGH. That's hard for an AI to hit. Prompts are source code at this point, except worse because source code usually gives you the same output for the same input... I could spend 8 hours making prompts and helper files and still get disappointed. It's hard to even call instruction files and promting an investment. And im glad the vibers can keep jumping between different IDEs but enterprises can't really do that.

And yeah you're talking AI, but the whole $20 retail cost to $150 investment cost is all of big tech, or was anyway. AWS was floating on government contracts then ratcheted up the prices to the point where I see like a new blog weekly about purchasing a small power plant and a datacenter because it's cheaper over a 60 month lease term than it is to use AWS. That's no accident IMO.

Im not even in corporate world that's just outside looking in.

And... let’s once again circulate the 1000 sats in our two-cynic-man circular economy ;). We just need to be careful not to do it too often, or we’ll end up featured in the top zapped lists and approached to promote crypto stuff as a Nostr Influencers 🤣

Okay this time I'll hold onto your sats XD