Wake up babe, there's a new filing in Tornado Cash, and it's just about as embarrassing as the rest of the shitshow the DOJ has been assembling over the past two years 👇

This time, it persists that Storm profited from Tornado Cash smart contracts, arguing directly against arguments made by the Fifth Circuit, which found that "none of the immutable smart contracts entitle the smart-contract creators to a benefit."

Imagine a car manufacturer being held liable for profiting from illicit activity because a car they manufactured was used in a bank robbery, or a computer manufacturer because a machine they sold was used in a hack.

Tornado Cash should have stopped illicit activity, even though we concede that Tornado Cash couldn't stop illicit activity, or so the argument goes.

What about the Chainalysis sanctions oracle Tornado Cash implemented to block OFAC listed entities from accessing the service?

That's "window dressing," the Government says – an inefficient step that was only taken to "make a public announcement that TC wasn't violating the law." OK then.

The Government continues to appear to allege that the sole purpose of Tornado Cash was to enable criminal transactions, again making references to the prosecution of Silk Road operator Ross Ulbricht – ignoring the fact that while Silk Road operated as a dark net market, Tornado Cash illicit transactions are only estimated to have made up around 14% of overall activity be the Government's own calculations, primarily pertaining to funds originating from hacks.

What's worse is that the Government doubles down on charging the developers for the development of a User Interface, continuing to attempt to enforce FATF recommendation 66 against FinCEN guidance and despite the lack of official adoption.

This case is a complete abomination of the US justice system. Everyone working on its prosecution should be fired.

https://www.therage.co/doj-tornado-cash-motion-to-dismiss/

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

As stupid as this is, it's the fiat system fighting back against #Bitcoin repricing everything.

The difference is there is no head on Bitcoin. Why do you sue? Satoshi disappearing was CRITICAL to the success of bitcoin. If you don't see that yet, you soon will (within years of trial and error or within months if you read aggressively on Bitcoin and history of money).

The Gov can sue every developer in Bitcoin just as they are suing the Tornado Cash developers. It's time to get a grip on reality.

They can try - but the developers will just relocate.

You can't stop a headless worldwide network. time to get a grip on reality.

ok clown

Just keep in your mind, the reason Tornado Cash was targeted was because it has a HEAD.

So important to understand.

We can debate the details forever, but the administrative state can get ANYONE for ANYTHING at ANYTIME. There are 100s of thousands of laws being used against all peoples.

YOU and everyone reading this has broken some law at some time because the system has centralized power into a deflector shield for the Elites.

Not understanding this base layer will cost you a LOT of money.

Thank you for the latest news on TC, always read your factual notes 📝 📋 👍

Cash is used for a lot of crime. The government manufactures cash. So by their own logic, there should be a ‘filing’ against them.

🔥 Yet another embarrassment for the DOJ in the Tornado Cash case exposed by nostr:nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qyv8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnxd46zuamf0ghxy6t69uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd46hg6tw09mkzmrvv46zucm0d5hsz9thwden5te0dehhxarj9ehhsarj9ejx2a30qyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvshszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcqyrv2dm8scwtw428hnfzf0l5mwlwfwa3ng50nefwxxn3qsev3zej8kss3ljd

The logic here? Utterly dystopian. Imagine holding toolmakers responsible for every misuse of their tools. By this standard, Ford is liable for getaway cars, and Apple for hacked Macs.

Let’s not forget: Tornado Cash implemented sanctions oracles to block OFAC-listed entities. But no, the Government waves this off as "window dressing," while insisting the sole purpose of #TornadoCash was criminality—even though their own data shows only 14% illicit usage.

And now, the developers? Being charged for creating an interface. It’s #FATF recommendation 66 on steroids, with zero regard for #FinCEN guidance or actual adoption.

This isn’t law enforcement—it’s a desperate attempt to criminalize open-source innovation. 🚨 A warning shot to every dev in #crypto: your code isn’t safe from centralized overreach.

If these actions stand, the consequences for privacy, technology, and innovation will be catastrophic. This isn’t just about Tornado Cash—it’s about the future of freedom in a digital age.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpk9xancv89h24rme53yhl6dh0hyhwce528eu5hrrfcsgvkg3vermqyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qy2hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mz7qpqye83hl3mutnrr8t34q4agxm9sfn0e5cus0fg7fqsfsr2npxluqxqznmd8u

I didn't know the TC team implemented filters at the contract level, thought it was only the UI. If *this* is not enough to keep the DOJ at bay, I don't know what is.

The DOJ might even be shooting themselves in the foot with this move: if the reward for compliance is still prosecution, why bother to comply?

TC only implemented filters on the UI as they couldnt implement them on the contract level – kind of the idea of "immutable"

Def agree with your last point!

> TC only implemented filters on the UI as they couldnt implement them on the contract level – kind of the idea of "immutable"

I think you can write modular smart contracts with dedicated functions that allow for things like replacement by a new contract when called by the right account. But I was definitely under the impression that it wasn't the case for TC, thanks for confirming!

That being said, I expect contract-level filters to be more and more the norm that regulators will expect devs to adhere to. Some companies are building it because there is profit to be made. When the tools are there, and maybe they are already, the immutability argument becomes weaker.

It's OK The Donald will save them. Oh, sorry, he's a POLITICIAN!

#freeRoss # FreeSamourai

"Imagine a car manufacturer being held liable for profiting from illicit activity because a car they manufactured was used in a bank robbery, or a computer manufacturer because a machine they sold was used in a hack."

It's already here and it'll get worse before it gets any better. Chained liability is an ongoing battle.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpk9xancv89h24rme53yhl6dh0hyhwce528eu5hrrfcsgvkg3vermqyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qy2hwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytn00p68ytnyv4mz7qpqye83hl3mutnrr8t34q4agxm9sfn0e5cus0fg7fqsfsr2npxluqxqznmd8u

This is a terrible precedence .