Replying to Avatar rabble

I don’t know nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m’s motivations but my guess is that he was stuck between a rock and a hard place. If he suspended Trump then shareholders would revolt and remove him as CEO. If kept him then users are upset, but he’d be able to keep running twitter and not have it taken over by hedge funds and activist investors.

Once January 6th happened, a bunch of other sites started suspending Trump and the decision much easier. I don not envy anyone who had to balance those interests.

users would be upset if Trump was allowed to stay ?

you're smoking some good shit.

removing Trump killed Twitter.

i understand you hate Nazis, i would too if i was gay, but what you're saying isn't based in reality.

the logic nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3samnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wddhkcmrfv3jhytnc09aqzxrhwden5te0wajkccm0d4jjumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2cfkckq used isn't mysterious at all. keeping Trump was the right choice. but the ZOG made it known that THEY are in charge and forced Jack to leave Twitter.

only a person with purple hair could fail to see something so obvious.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.