Like I said, it’s nuanced, and I’m conflicted.

When humans were evolving, we were lucky and delighted to slay a Woolly Mammoth and have red meat available for months.

At other times, we were perfectly able to thrive on nuts and berries.

The meat was great, because of high caloric density: we only needed to eat a fraction of the volume, to consume the same potential energy.

Sugar existed in the form of fruit or honey: we had to climb trees, or confront beehives, to access that extremely high level of caloric intake.

It’s all evolutionary. But I digress.

wrt Saife, I appreciate is insights about Bitcoin and economics. Keynesianism is inherently flawed, and Saifedean points that out. He also offers a solution - Bitcoin.

I agree with him on that.

But I think *delivery* is very important. If you want to convey a message that is critically important to humanity’s path, how it’s written matters, and I think Bitcoin Standard could use a “second edition” in that regard.