Nostr Web Client

Olas 0.1.7.1 has been released!

* Works with remote signers like Amber (on nsecbunker mode).

* The video tab now plays short videos with sound on and stops playing when you swipe out

* Yet even more performance improvements

* Fixed a bug where Android wasn't calculating blurhashes

* Always adds image dimensions when posting so nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6tcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qghwaehxw309amxjar0wghxummnw3erztnrdakj7qpqgcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqyw43nv is happier.

* "Some" fixes on NWC wallets, but its still quite buggy, will investigate more -- if you've received zaps on your Olas posts today, that was probably me zapping via NWC + remote signing those zaps.

Now live on nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejz7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yh8qunfd4skctnwv46z7qpq0r8xl2njyepcw2zwv3a6dyufj4e4ajx86hz6v4ehu4gnpupxxp7sdvr7w9 , Github and TestFlight:

https://testflight.apple.com/join/2FMVX2yM

AU9913 1y ago

Officially enrolling nostr:nprofile1qqs8l7cf847rw8vkkhta7v8faa066r5le7dds8tgnau7ng2d74ey2cgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgnwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxtcymzaec in #nsex because the feature was announced, but doesn't actually work and we've gotten no response. You're in good company tho, cuz nostr:nprofile1qqs9xtvrphl7p8qnua0gk9zusft33lqjkqqr7cwkr6g8wusu0lle8jcpp3mhxue69uhkyunz9e5k7qg4waehxw309ajkgetw9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0ds2g5zx8 and nostr:nprofile1qqsth7fr42fyvpjl3rzqclvm7cwves8l8l8lqedgevhlfnamvgyg78spzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqqdtrej are here too.

Devs know key rotation doesn't exist but still want us to trust them and paste our nsec all over the internet, and I'm tired of it. #NameAndShame

nostr:nevent1qqsxdfznn3ul4w35w77papzvvvukyvv32ur5epexzgcznazwfzzjhxqpzfmhxue69uhkummnw3eryvfwvdhk6tczyrafsj7hmweg9ur7zmn6apajdg48hxuskujx53rhrux0ttjcqx84yqcyqqqqqqgq6mmkr

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

really should be first thing BEFORE any public beta

WARTIME PSYCHOPATH™ ☣️⚔️ 1y ago

Pasting nsex is gay and should be condemned. Amber is working for me with Olas though, I didn't do anything special afaik

AU9913 1y ago

How're you doing it? I don't even see login with Amber, I just see bunker connection or pasting nsec

Laeserin 1y ago

I think you can use Amber as a bunker.

AU9913 1y ago

Inline nsec is #nsick

Laeserin 1y ago

Ah, I get what you mean, now.

AU9913 1y ago

Online **

Laeserin 1y ago

Yeah, mentally translated that.

WARTIME PSYCHOPATH™ ☣️⚔️ 1y ago

Idk. I went to look, cleared the bunker connection string, and tried connecting again and it won't connect 😂 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴇᴀᴛʜ ᴏꜰ ᴍʟᴇᴋᴜ 1y ago

very gay

Laeserin 1y ago

It's such an odd thing to deprioritize.

J.Do /=\ 1y ago

Nemmeno il portafoglio funziona!

It's Moro! 1y ago

no amber integration on android 😯

PABLOF7z 1y ago

Amber integration via NIP-55 is coming later this week, I mentioned this a couple of days ago. In the meantime , Amber integration via NIP-46 has been possible since day 1

AU9913 1y ago

Nip-46 requires the signer to be online, which is insecure. My nsec is precious and live inside of an application that has no network access incase the dev introduces malicious code to expose it.

Keychat 1y ago

When you mentioned Amber login, did you mean login via NIP-55 (Android Signer Application) rather than NIP-46 (Nostr Remote Signing)? I believe Amber implements both NIP-55 and NIP-46.

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/55.md

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/46.md

AU9913 1y ago

55, amber can be denied network access so I find that secure. 46 would be cool if there was a hardware device like a ring I could just tap with another finger to approve, but I haven't seen that yet.

Keychat 1y ago

In the NIP-46 protocol, the signer that stores the nsec does not expose the nsec. It only receives signing requests, completes the signing, and then sends the result out.

nostr:note1zhvanadlce4fm2svryk9e3wvw97q066zlq27wn9lcjav3lau5klq8f4mwh

AU9913 1y ago

Yes, but how is it the signing done? Via network comms right? So if the signer requires network access to work, then the dev pushes malicious code to publish the nsec, there's nothing you can do about it. Whereas nip 55 I can box up the signer with 0 network access so even if malicious code is pushed, it can't be transmitted.

ChipTuner 11mo ago

Someday NVault fixes most of this.

https://www.vaughnnugent.com/resources/software/modules/NVault

AU9913 11mo ago

Amber does already