There were no reputable voices opposing the popular narratives regarding covid and it's origins and the risks of jabs etc., except all the reputable voices that were, that were being censored. But OK. I didn't invent these concerns and observations out of nowhere. Massive intelligence failures resulting in death and possible alternate explanations and motives are certainly worth considering. Or you can just assume covid19 came from a wet market and the level 4 covid biolab was just coincidental. Trust the science or actually practice science via skeptical analysis? You choose for yourself. I'll choose skepticism and analysis over assumptions and trusting the popular narrative every time.
Discussion
Science isn't just posing questions and pointing out seeming coincidences. You are pretending to do science, not actually doing it.
You are doing exactly what I said at the start. Covid having originated from a wet market is boring, and random, and unsatisfying. The cooler narrative is that it was smuggled out of a lab. That makes a good movie.
Look, I'm not rejecting the theory, I'm just dismissing it until there is some concrete evidence, and people who actually spent their life studying this stuff done it convincing.
You sound "vaccinated".