Ive always known aspects of it were an inside job, but I assumed it was also a "never let a good tragedy go to waste", it now seems clear it was fully orchastrated from the top down.
Discussion
My very first reaction to it as I watched the live broadcasts was "oh that's rather convenient for georgie poo".
Oh it was completely manufactured, and a lot of people benefited. The owners of the towers saved a lot of money not having to deal with the asbestos problem, for one. And it was then easy to ram through the Patriot Act as well.
The asbestos, the energy efficiency, the cost of a controlled demolition under legal methods, the ability to collect insurance, and more ive heard. This film only briefly covered the incentives, it was more about the technical analysis of how the planes manuvered, the characteristics of the collapses etc.
Ill need to find another one that goes in depth on the characters involved if you have any recommendations.
The man who said "pull it" would be a good start.
But as much as it's interesting history, I'm in no need of being better convinced, and I think you probably already have encountered the hallucinations that normies have about the impossibility of the GoVeRnMeNt DoInG bAd ThInGs. ThAt'S iMpOsSiBlE. sOuRcEs?
