For me, brigading means that somebody posts on Facebook to get his followers to reply to something he didn't like on Twitter. Somebody brings his brigade to influence an opinion. If now these followers stay on Twitter to spread the word about something they genuinely like, it's not brigading anymore.

Now if people that follow nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg chime in where he chimes in here on nostr, that might also feel like brigading but I don't see that happening to any degree that would feel unnatural. I follow several eToken developers and clearly they spread the word but extremely respectful and not in a way that would drown opposing opinions which brigading often does.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's a Green Eggs and Ham approach to evangelizing:

Would you, could you, with nut zaps?

Would you, could you, in bitchat?

Except that after we tried it and didn't like it, the pitch just keeps going...

Would you, could you, in a gif?

Would you, could you, in emoji?

And I like weird things! I spent actual time thinking about how you could sign a Twitter message using an nsec (https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1500). I'm just not feeling the n+1'th place you can store arbitrary data, or potential existing trust relationship you might leverage.

The truth is that people don't want to run mints because there is no choice but to eventually break that trust by closing and rugging funds