I was trying to be generous but I agree.
Ego shows up in arguments a lot though which (back to my point) could be a side effect of human design or intended as part of the design. I'm not sure which it is.
Is the outcome for everyone better when we argue with ego?
(Sorry, just thinking aloud.)
I think most issues arenβt resolved until the ego is identified by both sides in a discussion or else itβll eventually turn into an argument.
And no apology necessary fren! π«ππ€
There's also subjective vs objective truth. Would you say conquering ego is sage-like and ideal but difficult for most?
I'm not sure it's ideal to be ego-less always. We probably have egos for a reason. They are often silly passengers in most cases though.
