Replying to Avatar Gzuuus

Edits are just visible for amethyst users by the moment right?
Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 1y ago

yep

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Gzuuus 1y ago

What implementation are you following? I saw that you purposed different ones.

I like the possibilities of this 👀

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 1y ago

We are doing this one: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/1090

Avatar
Gzuuus 1y ago

Thanks 🫡

Do you know if someone more it's implementing it?

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 1y ago

Not yet. Everybody has always been so affraid of even testing it. We will see if this changes over time.

Avatar
Gzuuus 1y ago

I like it, its pretty simple and straightforward, just another representation of the event without forcing a markup like EDIT: under the post. I also like the nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn proposal since its more wide and versatile... But i wonder what will happen if i do a kind1011 of a replaceable event 🤔

Avatar
Vitor Pamplona 1y ago

The kind 1011 should remain unchanged through multiple 1010s. Edits only replace the .content of the original event. They don't affect any other attached event.

Avatar
Gzuuus 1y ago

A yea for sure, just first thought after read it fast... Not well thought out xD 🤦