If they can’t prove ownership by signing, and do this periodically, it’s safe to assume they own zero bitcoin.
GBTC, coinbase, binance, all of them. They all have zero until proven otherwise.
Show me the signed message…or it’s zero.
If they can’t prove ownership by signing, and do this periodically, it’s safe to assume they own zero bitcoin.
GBTC, coinbase, binance, all of them. They all have zero until proven otherwise.
Show me the signed message…or it’s zero.
Right. These proof of reserves are more proof of address. We want to see that they haven't lost the keys.
My entire retirement is locked in GBTC 😅
I’m sorry man. Maybe things will work out for the best somehow. Try to get some bitcoin in cold storage.
Bitcoin signed messages don't prove ownership
Are you referring to signing a message with the key for an address that only temporarily has the correct balance?
Addresses don't have balances at all
Haha ok true. I don’t mean that in the ETH sense. I mean that UTXOs have been sent to an address that is related to a private key, which has signed a message, and not thereafter moved. That’s possible to check, right?