Nostr Web Client

lol now you’re pasting a book at me… like I said localized flooding in contained geographic regions happens. There are mega tsunamis in valleys and mountainous regions - and precisely why you find marine deposits … but that does not mean you had global flooding.

RedTailHawk 2w ago

You said I'm imagining things that don't happen so I shared with you a bunch of things that have happened that nobody can explain other than the pole flip hypothesis people.

You didn't read it. It's only 5 pages of my 26 pages of notes. What you're saying does not account for the stories of the day the sun set backwards, the day the sun stood still, and the legend of the long night. You didn't account for how the American Frozen Foods Association determined that no known process of nature could have frozen the Beresovka mammoth so perfectly.

Feel free to ignore what I wrote if that makes you sleep better but Ayn Rand was right. You can ignore reality but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

HoloKat 2w ago

It’s fairly common in disagreement to throw a bunch of seemingly related info at people in hopes of drowning them out with it instead of addressing a specific comment and this is what you’re doing. I’m done wasting time. Do watch the film.

Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW 2w ago

It may be common. However, It appears to me that he was just trying to educate you. You've admitted that you didn't read it, and are now making assumptions about his motivations rather than refuting the evidence. He's provided a lot of great information here and I'm thankful for it. I could provide you with an actual ebook on the topic. However, since you didn't bother reading his comment and referred to it as a book.. I doubt you'd read it. A documentary should be out in the next couple of days on the topic. I'll drop a link here when it's out, just in case you or anyone else wants to watch and learn. 🤝

HoloKat 2w ago

Actually I made a statement that refuted his comment and he did not reply to it but rather threw a bunch of unrelated info with a copy and paste from “research” that ignores basic geological knowledge. This is what you call a red herring. If he wanted an honest discussion he’d address my comment directly.

HoloKat 2w ago

Strawman

HoloKat 2w ago

I never admitted that I didn’t read it. I replied with a specific counterpoint that addresses a part of his reply. How you get “you admitted you didn’t read it and you won’t read this” is beyond me.

Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW 2w ago

I guess I assumed you didn't read it based on this. "lol now you’re pasting a book at me… like I said localized flooding in contained geographic regions happens."

The only reason I can see for this, is either you didn't read it or your idea of "localized flooding" includes the majority of land on earth being inundated with water from every ocean. If you're thinking "Waterworld" where there is no land anymore, that's not what we're talking about.

HoloKat 2w ago

This comment is full of erroneous interpretations with incorrect causalities. I do not want to spend time breaking it down. It’s up to you to be credulous and accept it at face value or question further. Over and out.

HoloKat 2w ago

His*

Jerome Powell 21iQ 40TPW 2w ago

🤝 Curious to hear your thoughts on the ongoing geomagnetic excursion, South Atlantic Anomaly, and now common low latitude auroras...

RedTailHawk 2w ago

Not trying to waste your time.

Gish gallup, I believe, is the term closest to that.

I'd say calling what I shared a gish gallup is a strawman.

I just was sharing the unsolved mysteries pole flip edition facts. Other causes could explain a number of them like continental drift, meteor impacts, etc. To be fair to the Occam's razor conversation, periodic pole flips resolves them all and explains a lot of other things, boiling it down to mostly one unknown: what triggers the induced fluidity in the top most layer of the asthenosphere by like 17 orders of magnitude for less than a day once every 6,000 years or so and what does a geomagnetic excursion have to do with it?

To be fair, the premise under debate encompasses a global scope. The pole flip possibility is not on most people's radar, so it would be necessary, in order to 'make the case' so to speak, to provide whatever ample evidence one has in favor of the theory in as reasonably concise a way as possible. With a global scope, making an underdog run, so to speak, for top dog in terms of hypothetical viability, one ought to expect at least a few pages worth of points. At a certain point, too much concision excludes the greater consilience that the collection of points, together, are meant to offer.