Nostr Web Client

Why is discrimination necessary? If it was necessary I would presume we need a fork to make this consensus. This is the same type of thing you would have heard from the State if we gave them an option to help design the new system. "We need to have the authority to stop bad TX."

However, here, you're just putting bad TX on a more exploitable and longer-term more costly location, UTXO set. Costly for yourself, as a node operator.

There is no option on the table to make Bitcoin purely monetary, you get that right? That's gone. We already added features, changed consensus.

markonyte 3mo ago 💬 2

Thats alright, we just get as close as possible to pure money. You also talk like the big change is coming from knots side when its actually the other side. Keeping something in place doesnt really indicate a thirst for more power.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

GermanHodl 3mo ago

💯 We don't want to change anything, we want the status quo. That's it.

⚡A C V⚡ 3mo ago 💬 1

It's a bug fix. It's not a big change. We have created two different mem-pools. This is a bad outcome and needs a bug fix. It forces developers to hack around and find private and privileged access to the mem-pools they need.

Users will have to go through centralized companies to get this access for themselves, to use these apps. Instead of these apps being decentralized and serving the politics of Bitcoin they will be centralized and serve standard politics.

You've stopped nothing, you've only made things harder for everyone. Present and future node operators and developers and users.

markonyte 3mo ago 💬 1

I've been listening to these reasons for months now. I prefer remaining hostile to stupid shit on chain.

⚡A C V⚡ 3mo ago

The Socialists of South America continue to be hostile to Capitalism. They're wrong too. Just because it sounds good, doesn't make it good.