Agreed, about slaying your heroes. I generally don't have heroes, but there are many people I respect, including Adam.
Also, don't assume the opposing argument is shit. Calling Sats "Bitcoin" has merit, opening up the OP_RETURN has merit.
Just my view on both is to keep them unchanged because those arguments have greater merit.
GM
Thought of the day.
Also it's raining and we're due to watch a wooden galleon shoot canon balls at our local pub in Ventnor at 1:30pm π
very diplomatic sir
Perhaps, but understanding and agreeing with the validity of an opposing view often helps you win the argument quicker and easier in my limited experience.
@π₯ππππ£
I dont assume itβs shit, I know itβs shit because i examined the argument and there is no logically valid justification.
playing a woke/gnostic word game thinking it has any essential effect on reality is βretardedβ in the most precise sense of the word for any rational adult
if it was named bits and matured as bits, i would be on team bits and the sat crowd would be retarded.
this entire issue is just a category error
an IQ test people are taking in public
A career in international diplomacy awaits you my friend π
itβs always been a tough road for philosophers π€£
Iβm about to get to the front lines of the culture war with my first book coming out end of june.
I have no delusions about what awaits. more slings and arrows than attaβboys
