Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Uxellodunum

I don't think that's accurate. If a centralised service deems it so, you may not only lose your IP provided by ICANN, but you'll lose your entire history of content on said platform and your digital identity.

Whereas if you take as many dependencies out of the equation and decentralise, you can reliably keep your content, and your identity. Your domain name? Use another one (we've seen this does work over time and feel do end up using provided mirrors if the platform provides value, ie, TPB and others).

Your IP? Much harder to work around, but who's to say 1. An alternative protocol isn't made in the face of necessity? or 2. You get hold of a "still whitelisted" IP and tunnel it for obfuscation - Again, a la Tor, which isn't perfect at all, and yet helps millions already circumvent authorities when needed.

Either way, I'd prefer to know my content remains somehow accessible, my idenitity remains intact and I at least hold a chance to get back to it and continue to build. Wouldn't you?

Avatar
The Fishcake (nostr.build) 2y ago

Fair points. Btw, I think IPs are governed by IANA not ICANN 🐶🐾🫡

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ApeCoin 2y ago

🔹 ApeCoin Airdrop Is Live!

🔹 https://campsite.bio/ape Claim free $APE.

Thread collapsed
Avatar
Uxellodunum 2y ago

Good point! They're seperate entities but overlap in some topics - Indeed, IPs are IANA's domain.

Thread collapsed