You should for example choose just two or three twitter kind nostr clients that have a chance to be widespread adopted and focus on these clients to make them great, with funds and development resources.
Discussion
thats the complete opposite of what nostr users want. we need more clients, more relays and for users to be spread on as many relays and clients as possible. otherwise whats the point of using nostr? we want decentralization, not a new X or Bluesky!
Nostr have 3 years, what good client do you see? I see no one.
All clients have a lot of bugs, are ugly, miss a lot of features.
All people that I know complain about the apps not working as expected.
We can have a lot of clients, I don't care, but we need at least one great client that is able to compete with big tech ones in features, UI, no bugs...
there might not be a big array of efficient clients rn but as the nostr space gets bigger and bigger we have:
- more developers (we already have more of them than big tech companies do)
- innovative features and ideas
and a bright future ahead. a lot has improved in 3 years, nostr will do its thing as long as we work towards client and relay diversity. lets give people a lot to choose from, users should be able to make choices. #nostrfreewill