For a more nature adoption we would just require some "official global relay", where some strict rules would be agreed, over which the train wouldn't go on this relay, but at the same time it would be used by most of the nostr protocol as a kind of connecting relay.
I'm sure it would have to be feebased to avoid spam, but let it be for the masses.
It would require some good advertising to introduce the relay to masses, but i think it is possible in the future.
Build, build and build π£
Eh. We don't want to fully centralize around one relay. Many clients have their own relays and those are popular enough, acting as the "official" relay that you mentioned for users of that client.
Thread collapsed
It donβt even need to be centralized.
As my English is not my mother tongue, i maybe misinterpretation my thoughts π€πΌ
But is possible this ?
I see the strict rules of btc confirmations and mining and Iβm thinking if this decentralized strict rules can be applied in the massesrelay π€
You're doing fine!
If all users connect to the same "global relay" as you mentioned, then we're all using the same service. This makes it centralized.
So you telling me if all start using btc, it would be centralized ?
If everyone started using the same custodial wallet, yes.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
It looks like fallacy to me bro, because if everyone suddenly starts using Btc, so that doesn't make it a centralized currency either if it using everyone, or maybe I'm just getting it wrong way.
#plebchain
Thread collapsed
you are both both right and wrong.
No, any central node is a single point of failure. That afaik goes against the very nature of Nostr.
And yes it's not centralized if you don't have to use it even if you and everybody else decide that you will.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed