Was thinking about "logic" in biology while reading Nick Lane's book "Power, Sex, Suicide" (ignore the catchy title; it's a great book). Not every logic applied by someone who studies nature is automatically bio-logic. In summary and retrospect, I would say that most of the logic I have used in my years in biology was math, physics, or engineering logic. Very little was truly bio-logic. Nick Lane, by contrast, argues very logically that bacterial design prevented them from growing and evolving the complexity of the higher organisms that surround us today. What I am trying to say is this: determine and address the root question (challenge) in what you do as early and as rigorously as possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Every discipline borrows logic from somewhere.

What matters is whether that logic actually matches the nature of the phenomenon.

I am suspicious of anything that I need a special way of knowing to know. "Bio-logic" feels a little like "my truth".

If you need a special key to understand it, maybe it’s not universal logic, it’s just belief.