The climate cult in Germany is something else.
English translation of: https://www.zeit.de/wissen/umwelt/2023-07/klimapolitik-verbot-co2-alltag-aufruf 
Discussion
"Climate sins."
Fuuuck next level propaganda, that's literally cult shit.
FUCK THE STATE
people don't get it until they get it
This year I’ve had 5 people take my recommendation and follow through reading Fossil Future by Alex Epstein.
People know something is wrong with the whole “climate change” narrative but they don’t know where to go for a counter argument and nobody wants to sound stupid or go against the grain without some knowledge.
After reading that book though all 5 got it and became pro-nuclear and dismissive of the narrative. We’ve got to get the other side out there to reasonable people. 
Going to have to push back on this. Nuclear is a centralized energy source and a national security threat. We should be focused on decentralizing energy production. That’s why I’m pro Solar not because it’s green but because it’s decentralized. Don’t be fooled the utilities and lizard people do not want you to go solar they make it difficult for people to own their own solar array.
Be your own utility.
Every iteration of a new energy source in mass production led to exponential growth in society as more dense energy could be harnessed cheaper. Nuclear was the last major leap we had and the entire technology was stifled by Team America World Police and their Petrodollar.
Solar is a major step backwards for the scale of humanity - fine if you want to be off grid individually or in small communities but completely inadequate for the flourishing of our species which requires massively MORE energy.
Your argument here reminds me of the shitcoiner argument about bitcoin not having enough throughput for transactions. Bitcoiners know that decentralization is more important then transaction speed.
Decentralized Energy Production > centralized energy production
Nuclear could be a great power source for industrial manufacturing but would also become a terrorist target (look what’s happening at the Zaporizhzhya NPP)
Also if power generation becomes more centralized the lizard people can throttle your energy consumption (similar to what they will do with CDBCs)
Disagree with this.
Under a Bitcoin standard, war will be unaffordable.
Nuclear power will power miners.
Okay Lowery 😂 Who would own the nuclear power plants powering the ASICs? Your version of the bitcoin standard is a centralized mining operation!
No need to reduce a debate to name calling and mockery.
I agree with decentralization of all things.
Look, I am no good with predicting the future, but I do see small scale modular nuclear reactors in the news. Viable? I hope so.
I apologize for the low blow but your bitcoin standard prediction was “softwar” in a nutshell.
As for the news, when have they actually been right about anything?
Apology accepted. Never read the softwar thesis. Funny and ironic that I never read it thinking that it sounded like bullshit.
Yet here I am, sounding off in a similar manner.
Depending on where you find your news, and related articles a person can form a decent scope of the picture of the topic.
Changing topics though.
I remember sending you a link about a device called a "Windbelt".
It's a small scale wind energy harvester.
I was really excited about it as it seemed to have great potential.
Zero news about it currently. 😔
Yeah there are lots of perpetual energy device scams that come and go. If your up north hydro is the best option assuming you have running water on your property. If not solar panels are going to be your best bet to produce your own sovereign electricity ⚡️
How do you deliver 80,000+ kWh per capita per annum to 8 Billion people all around the globe?
Hot tip - you don’t even dream of doing it with solar.
And if you’re worried about centralisation in energy I encourage you to look into the supply chain and manufacturing of solar and understand the choke points there.
Solar is never going to be the base layer for humanity’s energy requirements; the base layer needs to be the densest, cleanest, most long-lasting, durable and affordable energy source which hands down, is nuclear.
Ask people in developing countries if solar can meet the basic human requirements.
I’m not saying solar is perfect but it’s the best way for the average pleb to control their energy density.
I’m happy to debate you civilly in a nostr nests. There are lots of nuances and would be easier to hash out in an actual conversation.
You are arguing at an individual level, my arguments are at a societal level.
It’s like arguing Monero is better because it has better privacy for the individual - sure for that one use case at an individual level it is superior, but for the broad usecase of money Bitcoin is the better solution.
You’re ignoring the scaling trade offs of Solar because for your individual circumstances and calculations it’s better. That’s why you suggest small-scale hydro as the alternative as if people just have fucking rivers flowing through their 10 acre off grid properties (hint, 99.9999% of people have neither)…
If I’m truly concerned about TPTB disconnecting my power then yeah solar is better - if I’m concerned with empowering people to lead better lives then dense, abundant and cheap power is the way and that is nuclear.
You seem happier to have Billions forego energy abundance which would drastically improve their lives to live poorer but more sovereign - I reject that as it’s no better than the self-entitled attitude of the climate cultists who want us all to reduce our living standards and consume less energy for some supposed greater good.
Your greater good might be more noble and real than that of the cultists but I don’t believe you defeat this shit by making everyone live shittier more sovereign lives today, but rather you maximise the number of people whose lives get better with energy abundance which will lead them to sovereignty in future.
Let’s discuss this further in a nest!
I never said anything about using less power. We actually produce 3X more energy then our home consumes and mine/ sell excess to the grid.
Your starting to move goal posts around. I clearly stated nuclear energy would be good for industrial manufacturing but would make manufacturing plants terrorist targets.
I don’t care the power source as long as I can control it that’s why I recommend hydro for people in Canada because they don’t get as much sun.
Hydro, Solar, geothermal are all great (not wind) wind is a shitcoin
Nuclear leads to centralization of energy production and i will not simp
Me: How do you deliver 80,000+ kWh per capita per annum to 8 Billion people all around the globe?
You: Ask people in developing countries if solar can meet the basic human requirements.
Me: *explains why I’m talking about nuclear at a societal level which can deliver that 80,000 kWh*
You: I never said anything about using less power.
I don’t move goalposts. I told you the goalposts and you talked about people having their basic needs met and then I explained why that isn’t what I’m talking about.
I’m talking about people generally, you’re talking about yourself and delivering a bare minimum to everyone else as if that’s sufficient because fuck them, you’ve got 3X what you need.
I want humanity to flourish and that requires abundant energy. I’ll take the flourishing now and the sovereignty later, you want the sovereignty now and fuck the flourishing.
That’s fine, that’s your frame, but I’m not entertaining your frame because it’s no different than the climate cultists other than it comes from the other side.
TLDR
Your literally the soy boy from the memes screaming at the top of your lungs for governments and oligarchs to feed you nuclear power.
I’m the laser eyed bitcoiner that doesn’t complain and produces my own energy.
We are not the same.
No. I’m just a pragmatist who realises who has what. Mostly because I fund 9/10 of my fellow citizens via taxes.
I want Bitcoin to be global money, I want people globally to flourish. I recognise the limitations to both.
You want what’s good for you.
We are definitely not the same.
What the fuck are you even saying?
Solar is the most affordable decentralized energy source for developing countries, bitcoin citadels, plebs, you, me, everyone.
A true bitcoiner realizes this.
Solar is not abundant for northern living people. I'm one of them.
Wind is unpredictable.
Massive amounts of energy is required for living in the north.
I vote nuclear. The methods of delivery will improve as will administration, under a Bitcoin standard.
The delivery and deployment would be infinitely better today if Team America World Police had not stopped nuclear power from proliferating for the past 50 years to protect their petrodollar.
Americans don’t understand the scale of shit their empire has dumped on humanity.
Wow. Just wow. Especially the comments.
In polling, they have had the highest support for the green/climate hysteria agenda for decades. They are getting what they have been asking for.
I haven’t looked at any recent polling to see if anything has shifted in the last couple years. It will be interesting to see if that ever happens.
🤦 okay then start with politics and central media
The Cathedral ain’t gonna ban themselves mate.
It’s not gonna be pretty
It's all about control. Fascists.