Nostr Web Client

I'm now knowledgeable on the details, but that sounds right. Essentially you're saying there should never be a "cannot zap, no wallet" message from a client, because lack of a LUD16 should fallback to NIP-60.

Even before that, though, it seems most clients don't even provide a mechanism to *opt* to zap to NIP60, right?

Sync 11mo ago

Not that I have anything like that implemented 😂 but makes most sense I just think/fear that some clients might not want to adopt this method for fear of making lightning adoption even less used. And the nip-60 should still be only used for very small amounts, having clients just be able to access the wallet without any guardrails could be a great honeypot 😂

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

vinney...axkl 11mo ago

clients should keep their opinions to a minimum regarding what money people use

Sync 11mo ago

💯 also looking at the current state of LUD16 that are tied to npubs 99% are custodial so 🤷‍♂️, but would love to see nip-60 have some wider adoption 🚀