Subnostr

So, can talk about this high fee environment and how it's effectively creating the same mobility issue as gold? Did Rune do this, because it's effectively an attack on the network. If that's true, then the what are the proposed solutions?

I've heard people talk about spam filters for the network, but isn't that effectively censoring transaxrions? If we start censoring transactions, then maybe someone can help me understand from a technical aspect, how this censorship-resistant asset stays censorship free... while we begin to censor?

#Bitcoin #WTF

Matt 1y ago

Applying a filter to your own machine isn't censorship. Censorship requires force, and there's no force being applied to other miners. Anyone can come in and not filter if they wish. I lean toward no filters, but calling it censorship is inaccurate. That's the answer to your question. False premise.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Matt 1y ago

Or nodes

21seasons 1y ago

By applying filters to own node is only that you're censoring yourself, and there's nothing wrong with that. But applying network level filters to some implementation which are on by default, is that kind of censoring that could be worrying