Sure, the burden of proof is on them. The question of religious truth is beside the point of the original discussion, I just felt compelled to mention it as an adherent of a religion I'm convinced is true. The point I was making is: if a religion is true, it is not technology.
Discussion
And if all religions aren't true, then they are all technologies. Which was my original point in my reply to your OP ;)
But agreed that we don't have to get into the question of religious truth here. We can leave it at the "IFs and THENs" of our various positions