Don’t worry when that happens we’ll get bigger block’s finally
Discussion
Segwit resulted in 4x the block size and is partially the reason we find ourselves in the situation we are in today. The average block size this epoch so far is about 1.6 MB. Miners are trying to figure out how they can fill up the block space. Shitcoiners are trying to solve this by minting shitcoins on Bitcoin.
Right back on your horse, eh puz?
This is 100% what is going to happen. The miners have to be in on this shit. It’s just too easy to see through this crap. I wonder Who’s getting paid?? I don’t care if it’s consensus or functionality. It’s BS
I’m not sure I get the meme. Would miners not want an unlimited op_return so the data stays in the witness block?
Miners want unlimited data because it makes the block space more limited and hence the fee per Vbyte more and they make more $$. Also if they need to do these out of band. They can charge a premium.
Yeah let’s get 2 mb blocks & Segwit 2x
If segwit never happened you'd be screaming for it meanwhile complaining about fees.
Thank God for LN.
What the fuck are you talking about?
The average block size is slightly over 1MB why would I be screaming for larger blocks?
Blocks would be full and miners wouldn’t be conspiring with Bitcoin core to make mempool policy changes.
Don’t fucking tell me what I would be for or against. You are acting like a shitcoiner trying to put words in my mouth. If you have a question ask.
schnorr signatures (as used in taproot) were on offer at the time, and it was my opinion it was the better option for solving the tx malleability problem back in 2017
and now we have them, but they rape it with this other shitcoin "taproot" bullshit you can't just do a schnorr signature, you have to hash your secret key and then use that. efficiency :vomit: