I think people are hoping that by funding content creators through zaps, we can avoid the advertising model and the inherent pitfalls of such a model.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That model exists because it works. It puts the burden of costs on the seller who can stomach larger investments when they consider the full customer lifetime value.

I don’t like the incentives it produces, but there’s no denying it’s economically feasible and desired.

I didn’t imply that it doesn’t work, just that there are idealists who believe a zapping V4V could replace it. I haven’t seen any evidence that it can, but I hold out hope that it might.