False Equivalency. Time to catch up. One group was debanked for actual money laundering via NGOs while the other was debanked for excersising their first amendment rights. Its ironic that our great hero nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhx6mmnw3ezuur4vgkhjsen would repost this given his track record to stifle free speech on twitter.
Discussion
I agree with the equivalency part. However we can’t assume nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3vamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwwpexjmtpdshxuet5uncanx ‘s motivations. Maybe he likes people to use bitcoin, regardless of what the incentive for it is? We just don’t know.
But like how about we don’t use banking as a weapon. Let them get convicted of money laundering otherwise it’s just politicians getting to decide who to debank. So insane people defend this shit