Agree paper can be torn down, but what about stencil+spraypaint?
A chemist I know made most of his fortune from grafitti-removal formulations, its non-trivial even if someone else is paying...
the freedom tech we need is something like this wall printer:
https://youtu.be/-z6H6lN5Shg?si=7Xeiw3zpdvKZyxBh
or better yet something that prints onto interlocking puzzle mats:
that can be bonded to a building exterior wall to create a weather resistant billboard anywhere that cannot be easily ripped off
the entire billboard along with tools to install it must fit in average size backpack
yes it can still be painted over but most people don't carry paint on them. everyone has hands they can use to tear down a paper sign.
the tech must be such that it is faster and easier to install the billboard than to remove it.
the billboard should contain some propaganda message and a QR code that leads to an internet page.
because preaching to the choir is a waste of time. we must reach out to normies and that can only be done in the physical world.
nostr:npub1acg6thl5psv62405rljzkj8spesceyfz2c32udakc2ak0dmvfeyse9p35c
nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr
nostr:npub1c856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsmq6lkc
nostr:npub1494rtg3ygq4cqawymgs0q3mcj6hucvu4kmadv03s5ey2sg32df5shtzmp0
nostr:npub1xzs45n639h6hdttxhnpye2lcfeddlt3u2xl8zcvz07l9uy8tfpdqvxreq5
Discussion
i suppose if you are OK with a small and simple design stencil + spray paint is the way to go.
but will anybody pay attention to it ?
Simple and high-contrast. Attention marketplace is crowded.
one reason i didn't like the stencil idea ( my parents are Architects and so was my sister ( who is dead ) so i have definitely thought about it ) is it would not work very well for a QR code ...
which actually made me think - maybe we need a new type of "QR code" that can specifically be drawn using a stencil or by hand.
i remember Mark Zuckerberg had his Facebook engineers paint a giant QR code on top of FB headquarters - but that ordeal took like the whole day with a lot of measuring and many smart people working to paint it.
smartphone cameras today have WAY MORE resolution than regular QR codes need to be read. if a QR code is something like 30 X 30 pixels a basic smartphone camera is 3,000 X 4,000 pixels resolution. in other words in the 30 years since QR code was invented cameras got a lot better and we can relax the geometry used in QR codes to make them easier to paint and still have them 100% reliably read by modern smartphones which have both better cameras and orders of magnitude better processing than what was available 30 years ago.
a new type of QR code could be a new type of freedom tech as well ...
frankly a modern phone can just take a picture of a page of a book and use optical character recognition to read the whole page without any code ...
so there is quite a lot of latitude with implementing a QR code alternative with this level of power
Good thoughts.
We don't need a QR code alternative, just a stencil-friendly "style" of QR codes even if they violate the spec. The error correction is pretty rugged already, should handle asymmetrical blocks / non-rectangular blocks.
We should experiment and see how different phones perform for different "styles".
no nigger i already invented the new system you can't go back now.
it's just a block of text but instead of using regular characters only special characters that are easy to draw, paint, stencil and OCR recognize for example:
"^+=ETYUIOSFHJKLZXCVN<>" are easy to produce and recognize
on other hand:
"@,&" are hard to stencil or draw and / or may be hard to recognize at low resolution
remember also that most characters have have 8 different orientations because they can be rotated by 90 degrees 4 times plus mirrored. each of 8 orientations can count as a separate character.
and i only used as examples characters present on my keyboard but you can pull numbers, letters and special characters from all languages such as ancient greek, japanese etc.
some new characters can be created as well.
we could easily have, say 256 easy to create and reliable to recognize characters ... swastika could be a character for example, and we could also have a separate swastika that spins in reverse direction ... or we could have letter "H" but horizontally on the side or letter "S" but mirrored etc.
so one character is 8 bits then and a 30 x 30 matrix of 1-bit dots is replaced with a 12 x 12 grid of these characters.
we could produce several thousand "candidate" characters then BENCHMARK them on how quickly they can be drawn by hand, painted with a brush, how well they work with a stencil and how reliably they are recognized with poor lighting or vandalism etc.
then we pick the best 256 or the best 128 or 64 or 32 or 16 characters depending on feedback.
maybe it will be too painful for human mind to draw by hand using 256 different characters. maybe having 16 characters will be more intuitive for painting by hand in terms of things like muscle memory.
this will all be determined by testing.
here are some more ideas for possible characters:
each character would be roughly 5 by 5 pixels.
then each 9 characters would be grouped into a 3 X 3 sub block like a face of a rubik's cube
and the larger code would be made up of these sub blocks
this would be analogous to paragraphs in written text
there is one billion websites. 1 billion is 30 bits.
let's say we go with 6 bits per character ( 64 distinct characters ) then we need just 5 characters to represent any website
a single 3 X 3 character sub block would be 9 characters where the first 5 or 6 are the information and the remaining ones are for error correction.
so just one sub-block would be enough to represent a link to any website. this could be easily drawn by hand.