■ ■ ■ ▮ ▮ ▮ so ▮ ▮ ▮ and so on! Hope ▮ ▮ ▮ sense 😂 ▮

I literally just read this response when I saw your note. I was curious myself so just asked AI to see what would come about… paragraph summary on bottom.

Anyone else feel free to chime in if this is incorrect…

Today, March 18, 2025, approximately 80,000 pages of previously classified files related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy were released, fulfilling a directive from President Donald Trump announced on March 17, 2025. This release includes around 2,400 newly discovered FBI records, digitized and inventoried as part of the process triggered by Trump’s January 23, 2025, executive order to declassify documents concerning the assassinations of JFK, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. The files are now accessible through the National Archives, both online and in person at their College Park, Maryland location.

### Highlights of the Release

While experts and historians have cautioned that the documents are unlikely to fundamentally alter the official narrative—that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating JFK on November 22, 1963—several details have emerged that add nuance and fuel ongoing debates. Here are the key points:

1. **CIA Monitoring of Oswald**: The files confirm the CIA was tracking Oswald more closely than previously admitted, particularly during his trip to Mexico City weeks before the assassination. Memos detail his visits to the Soviet and Cuban embassies, including a phone call to the Soviet Embassy requesting a visa. This has reignited questions about whether the agency missed or downplayed a potential threat.

2. **FBI Warning About Oswald’s Death**: One document reveals an FBI call warning of a threat to Oswald’s life shortly before he was killed by Jack Ruby on November 24, 1963. This suggests some prior awareness of danger, though it’s unclear if this was acted upon effectively.

3. **Oswald’s Cuban Intelligence Ties**: New insights into Oswald’s interactions with Cuban intelligence operatives in Mexico City have surfaced, hinting at possible foreign connections. However, no definitive evidence ties this to the assassination itself.

4. **Mafia Motives Noted**: Some files mention mafia figures expressing motives to target JFK, possibly linked to his administration’s crackdown on organized crime. While intriguing, no concrete proof connects them to Oswald or the event.

5. **Single-Bullet Theory Reinforced**: Ballistics evidence in the release continues to support the Warren Commission’s “single-bullet theory,” which posits one bullet caused multiple wounds to JFK and Governor John Connally. This remains a point of contention among skeptics.

6. **Agency Communication Failures**: The documents highlight breakdowns in information sharing between the CIA and FBI. The CIA knew of Oswald but didn’t flag him as an immediate threat to the FBI, a lapse that has long been speculated upon but is now better documented.

### Controversial Aspects

The release has sparked controversy, not necessarily for rewriting history, but for amplifying existing tensions and conspiracy theories:

- **CIA Negligence vs. Complicity**: The detailed monitoring of Oswald has led some, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to argue it points to negligence—or worse, complicity—by the CIA. RFK Jr., Trump’s Health and Human Services nominee, has long claimed “overwhelming evidence” of CIA involvement, though the files don’t provide a smoking gun to support this. Critics argue this is being politicized, with JFK’s grandson Jack Schlossberg calling the declassification a “political prop” on X.

- **Second Shooter Hints**: While ballistics lean toward Oswald acting alone, vague references to a “second shooter” in witness statements or acoustic analysis (previously debated by the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979) have resurfaced. These remain unproven and contested, but they’ve energized conspiracy theorists.

- **Transparency vs. Exploitation**: The unredacted nature of the release—Trump insisted on no redactions—has been praised for transparency but criticized as a populist move. Some historians, like Fredrik Logevall, suggest the lack of major revelations means it’s more symbolic than substantive, while others see it as pandering to a public hungry for conspiracy validation.

- **Timing and Context**: Dropping this amid Trump’s second term, alongside other high-profile declassification promises (e.g., RFK and MLK files still pending), has led to accusations of distraction from current policy challenges. The Justice Department’s scramble to review the files overnight after Trump’s Monday announcement adds to perceptions of rushed sensationalism.

In summary, the JFK files released today don’t overturn the lone-gunman conclusion but provide fresh details that both clarify and complicate the narrative. The controversial elements—CIA oversight, foreign ties, and agency failures—keep the assassination’s mysteries alive, even if they don’t definitively resolve them. For a deeper dive, the National Archives’ online portal is the place to explore the raw documents.

#asknostr

nostr:nevent1qqsz6kmmdwguzmstz00zwej6xm4jerusdsux8dkquya4lkq0h2kca9cpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qrzg96zjavgatsx5ch2vvtq4atatly5rvdwqgjp0utxw45zeznvyqxpqqqqqqz7649dm

Yes. Dis tune.

No revelations!

Listen to The exit node by Genesis Block on #SoundCloud

https://soundcloud.com/user-347598850/the-exit-node?ref=clipboard&p=a&c=1&si=359ce9833eba4b4e8a2297d849523fb0&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

Good? No. Exciting? Yes, time traveler Abraham Lincoln gets the job done. 😅