Yes:
How the State Captures Bitcoin w/ nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqtxwaehxw309anxjmr5v4ezumn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tmwwp6kyvtjw3k8zcmp8pervct409shwdtwx45rxmp4xseryerdx3ehy7f4v3axvet9xsmrjdnxw9jnsuekw9nh2ertwvmkg6n5veen7cnjdaskgcmpwd6r6arjw4jsqgq6lcx8fc7h0p8t4ya9u0a92jnwavqe9rgjwwdw3wjgxfuxsz8rd5mths8c
We discuss:
- Free Speech
- State Co-option of Bitcoin
- Bitcoin as Freedom Money
- The Bitcoiner’s Moral Dilemma
Watch here: https://youtu.be/Kr2PkbOntWw
Discussion
Seems like the obvious problem wirh this strayegy. It would be the easiest way to fund the SBR in a budget neutral way.
'Trusted Third Parties are a security hole.'
They'll pay a premium and Saylor will become the richest man on earth and shareholders will get paid handsomely with printed money that, some of us, will dump directly back into the coin.
The problem is that printed money is NGD tech and you can't get your stack back with that trash.
I think you're missing my point. Under no circumstances would I recommend anyone do anything with their money, let alone sell corn for fiat game tickets, but if you've been playing the fiat game correctly, the upside in the short run could outpace short term bitcoin price action for the portion of your wealth that was allocated appropriately to fiat game tickets. This will always be the case. On the generational timeframe for non-active traders, native corn will be the safer thing to do.