I know that you will bend definitions as far as you can to make a point, but the bending is what diminishes any value of the point.
Not allowing 3D videos in hardcover printed paper books is not censorship.
Discussion
If someone found a way to do it but couldn't only because book printers refused to print books with such videos in them, that would be censorship -- even if they decreed that they were following a certain "book printing protocol" and blamed the prohibition on that protocol
As for "bending definitions," I don't think the way I apply the definitions of words counts as bending them. I apply them in ways that highlight counterintuitive realities to demonstrate that there *are* counterintuitive parts of reality that fit the natural definition of things you might not expect them to.